Daytripper
Team Owner
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2020
- Messages
- 1,526
- Points
- 223
But so many people said last year that Tony's lack of interest in NASCAR wasnt a problem for SHR.
Yep. Hate it. Interesting how he slammed the Toyota Driver Development Program, and then bails on Ford's guy. Who is screwing careers here?Looks like Tony wants to cash out. Off to NHRA
Honestly, I don't think Smoke is disinterested, he just has other things going on....But so many people said last year that Tony's lack of interest in NASCAR wasnt a problem for SHR.
Hate to disagree, but I think Tony's interest in NASCAR really only ever went as far as his own driving career. I think he has basically been disengaged since the day he got out of the car. I always felt that for Tony, NASCAR was more of a means to an end than a true calling. Much like what people have said about Kyle Larson since he showed up in NASCAR.Honestly, I don't think Smoke is disinterested, he just has other things going on....
I agree with that.Hate to disagree, but I think Tony's interest in NASCAR really only ever went as far as his own driving career. I think he has basically been disengaged since the day he got out of the car. I always felt that for Tony, NASCAR was more of a means to an end than a true calling. Much like what people have said about Kyle Larson since he showed up in NASCAR.
Nature of business, unfortunately.Yep. Hate it. Interesting how he slammed the Toyota Driver Development Program, and then bails on Ford's guy. Who is screwing careers here?
I'm sure he is, but the question is did Tony ever actually put any of his own money into the team, or was he given an ownership stake for signing on? If so, his stake could represent a handsome if not a huge profit.I’m pretty sure Gene Haas remains the majority shareholder in SHR.
The rumor mill said GM wrote Gene a check … I have no idea.I'm sure he is, but the question is did Tony ever actually put any of his own money into the team, or was he given an ownership stake for signing on? If so, his stake could represent a handsome if not a huge profit.
At the time, it was reported he put no money into the team. He probably owns a small percentage of the team.I'm sure he is, but the question is did Tony ever actually put any of his own money into the team, or was he given an ownership stake for signing on? If so, his stake could represent a handsome if not a huge profit.
Brett says Kaulig could merge with Trackhouse.
It would make sense at this point, although it’s kinda disappointing how much and how quickly Kaulig’s programs have fallen off. They’re not as competitive in either of Cup or Xfinity as they were just a couple of years ago and they’re taking funded drivers…seems like they expanded a bit too much too soon.I've been wondering about the possibility.
Kaulhouse Racing. (Just a silly guess)It would make sense at this point, although it’s kinda disappointing how much and how quickly Kaulig’s programs have fallen off. They’re not as competitive in either of Cup or Xfinity as they were just a couple of years ago and they’re taking funded drivers…seems like they expanded a bit too much too soon.
Agreed, capital gain is a better term it.The rumor mill said GM wrote Gene a check … I have no idea.
Huge profit? Capital gain, actually. 4 Cup Charters “purchased” in 2015 at the low, low introductory price of $ 0.00 …
Kaulhouse Racing. (Just a silly guess)
When *racing* reporters comment on business matters, I take it with a grain of salt, because most of them are pretty clueless and often misinterpret their information. Pockrass is one exception; he is careful and generally accurate.I’m pretty sure Gene Haas remains the majority shareholder in SHR.
Quite possible. One forgets now what a dumpster fire Haas was before Tony came on board. Giving someone half of that organization would be like giving them 100,000 share of K-Mart stock at the time.When *racing* reporters comment on business matters, I take it with a grain of salt, because most of them are pretty clueless and often misinterpret their information. Pockrass is one exception; he is careful and generally accurate.
However, when Stewart-Haas Racing was formed, the New York Times published a news article about it... written by a NYT *business* reporter, and published in the NYT business section. It said explicitly that Smoke's equity share was 50%. I regard that as a reliable source of the equity at that time.
Toyota gives young drivers a shot.....not a guarantee. Tony was suggesting that Toyota was grabbling all of the talent without enough seats, and screwing careers. Complete bull****. Other teams and OEMs have demonstrated the willingness to take what Toyota has developed, and sign them. Ford and Chevy are welcome to follow suit, but Ford hasn't--even though they made noise that they would, and The Felon--who is Chevy--has openly and repeatedly stated that he is fine with somebody else developing his talent.Nature of business, unfortunately.
Honestly, he was not wrong about his comments either. However, Ford isn't exactly filling to the brim with prospects at lower levels outside of Deegan and Herbst (depending on where his money takes him) atm. Literally is the only development driver I know of, now Cam Waters is getting his feet wet as well in the Ford camp.
No shade at any of the OEMs, at all. Just an opinion.
Good point.Quite possible. One forgets now what a dumpster fire Haas was before Tony came on board. Giving someone half of that organization would be like giving them 100,000 share of K-Mart stock at the time.
I don't think it's unfair to point out that for a long time Toyota seemed to have a lot more drivers in the pipeline then they had potential seats for. With the addition of 23XI and Legacy, I think that argument is largely moot now. Since you couldn't help yourself and threw the "felon" into the argument, I think it's important to point out that the current HMS lineup contains NOBODY that could be considered a former Toyota development driver in any way, Byron's year at KBM included. I also think it's worth noting that the Toyota Cup lineup consists of what, TWO drivers that are genuine Toyota development guys, and one of them was born into it.Toyota gives young drivers a shot.....not a guarantee. Tony was suggesting that Toyota was grabbling all of the talent without enough seats, and screwing careers. Complete bull****. Other teams and OEMs have demonstrated the willingness to take what Toyota has developed, and sign them. Ford and Chevy are welcome to follow suit, but Ford hasn't--even though they made noise that they would, and The Felon--who is Chevy--has openly and repeatedly stated that he is fine with somebody else developing his talent.
Still hate that Tony is likely leaving. While his shots at Toyota were ass clown quality, I recognize his value to the sport.